Fodor’s RHBS model on the resurrection: Part IIIMethodological naturalism and miraclesNov 9, 2024Nov 9, 2024
Published inHistorical ChristianityFodor’s RHBS Model of Resurrection Evidence: Part IIIndividual hallucinations in non-clinical populationsOct 3, 20241Oct 3, 20241
Published inHistorical ChristianityFodor’s RHBS naturalistic model on the resurrection: Reburial, Hallucinations, Biases…Part I: Reburial of Jesus’ Body as an Explanation for the Empty TombSep 26, 20241Sep 26, 20241
Introductory Chapter on the ResurrectionSample chapter from my forthcoming book on the ResurrectionAug 22, 2024Aug 22, 2024
Blog UpdateI’m so thankful to all those who have read the blog — both regular and occasional readers. I never intended to take such a long break —…Aug 13, 2024Aug 13, 2024
Hume, Bayes, and the Criteria For MiraclesTrading off false-positives and false-negativesJun 26, 20231Jun 26, 20231
Published inInterfaith NowIs Suffering and Evil Better Explained by Christianity or Naturalism?The strongest argument against the existence of God.Jun 21, 20232Jun 21, 20232
Published inInterfaith NowDesigned for Life? Is Fine-Tuning Due to God, or the Multiverse?A summary of the fine-tuning argument and response to key objectionsMay 25, 20232May 25, 20232
Why a Methodological Naturalism Approach to the Resurrection is (Usually) CircularMcLatchie vs Paulogia Resurrection Debate: Why Priors MatterApr 25, 20232Apr 25, 20232