Nick MeaderFodor’s RHBS model on the resurrection: Part IIIMethodological naturalism and miracles1d ago11d ago1
Nick MeaderinHistorical ChristianityFodor’s RHBS Model of Resurrection Evidence: Part IIIndividual hallucinations in non-clinical populationsOct 31Oct 31
Nick MeaderinHistorical ChristianityFodor’s RHBS naturalistic model on the resurrection: Reburial, Hallucinations, Biases…Part I: Reburial of Jesus’ Body as an Explanation for the Empty TombSep 261Sep 261
Nick MeaderIntroductory Chapter on the ResurrectionSample chapter from my forthcoming book on the ResurrectionAug 22Aug 22
Nick MeaderBlog UpdateI’m so thankful to all those who have read the blog — both regular and occasional readers. I never intended to take such a long break —…Aug 13Aug 13
Nick MeaderHume, Bayes, and the Criteria For MiraclesTrading off false-positives and false-negativesJun 26, 20231Jun 26, 20231
Nick MeaderinInterfaith NowIs Suffering and Evil Better Explained by Christianity or Naturalism?The strongest argument against the existence of God.Jun 21, 20233Jun 21, 20233
Nick MeaderinInterfaith NowDesigned for Life? Is Fine-Tuning Due to God, or the Multiverse?A summary of the fine-tuning argument and response to key objectionsMay 25, 20232May 25, 20232
Nick MeaderWhy a Methodological Naturalism Approach to the Resurrection is (Usually) CircularMcLatchie vs Paulogia Resurrection Debate: Why Priors MatterApr 25, 20232Apr 25, 20232